2026-03-19- Pod Cast - Social Work England

📂 Meetings, Interview and Complaints

48 views @stealingofemily 👍 1

This podcast examines a difficult and deeply personal attempt to get answers from Social Work England after years of unresolved concerns. It follows a call in which longstanding issues are raised about a social worker, historic family records, safeguarding, and the handling of earlier complaints. Central to the discussion is the claim that previous concerns had already been reported more than once, given reference numbers, and then closed without any outcome that felt meaningful or adequate.

The conversation begins with an account of an incident said to date back to 2009, involving allegations that false information was created about a family structure and that this had serious consequences for family relationships. The caller explains that these concerns were not minor misunderstandings, but matters believed to have had lasting effects over many years. The call then moves into wider safeguarding issues, including the claim that NHS records relating to a daughter could no longer be properly found or verified, intensifying the sense that something serious had gone wrong and had still not been properly addressed.

A major theme running through the podcast is repetition without resolution. During the call, the response repeatedly returns to process: fill in another form, raise another concern, submit more information again. In contrast, the caller repeatedly states that this has already been done, that concerns have already been submitted multiple times, and that reference numbers already exist for earlier complaints that were later closed. The result is a conversation shaped by a clash between institutional procedure and personal urgency: one side directing the matter back into process, the other demanding that somebody finally take ownership and explain what action will now be taken.

The call also highlights the frustration of trying to pin down responsibility. The caller asks who is actually responsible for acting on serious safeguarding information and who is meant to respond when prior complaints have already been closed. At several points, the answer given is that safeguarding concerns should be taken to the police, while concerns about a social worker should be made through the online concern process. That answer, however, does not satisfy the deeper question being asked in the conversation: what happens when someone believes they have already reported serious concerns several times, yet still feels that no one has properly engaged with the substance of what was said.