uk_mp_emails_updated_2026-10-11_verified_additions.csv.
change-this-password-now.
Gmail password field requires a Gmail App Password, not your normal Google password.
aaron.callan@parliament.uk abena.oppongasare.mp@parliament.uk abrahamsd@parliament.uk abtisam.mohamed.mp@parliament.uk adam.dance.mp@parliament.uk adam.jogee.mp@parliament.uk adam.thompson.mp@parliament.uk adnan.hussain.mp@parliament.uk adrian.ramsay.mp@parliament.uk afzal.khan.mp@parliament.uk
FORMAL NOTICE: Failure of Statutory Safeguarding Duties and Request for Immediate Professional Standards Assessment Triage keywords: safeguarding concern; missing person; missing vulnerable person; child protection; vulnerable adult; risk of harm; public protection; duty of care; police professional standards; formal complaint; NHS records unable to locate; MP safeguarding disclosure; urgent manager review required; reference number requested safeguarding concern; missing vulnerable person; child protection; risk of harm; police professional standards; formal complaint; NHS records unable to locate; MP safeguarding disclosure; urgent manager review required; reference number requested. * Correspondence Triage Framework. * Ministerial Correspondence Guidance. * Safeguarding Escalation Workflow. * AI Classification Policy. * Case Management Configuration. * Keyword, routing, escalation or manager-review rules. * Any automated triage, NLP, AI, sentiment-analysis or workflow rules applied to this email. If this correspondence is processed by any automated correspondence-triage, case-management, workflow, AI-classification, NLP, sentiment-analysis, or routing system, I request preservation of the audit trail, classification results, routing decisions, escalation actions, safeguarding flags, manager-review actions, and all associated case notes. For the Attention of: Chief Constable / Professional Standards Department Sussex Police and Surrey Police For the attention of every Member of Parliament (United Kingdom), I request preservation of the audit trail, classification results, routing decisions, escalation actions, safeguarding flags, manager-review actions, case notes, internal referrals, workflow history, and user-access logs associated with this correspondence. Urgent County Enquiry Emily Newbold DOB 30/10/2006 - Urgent Intervention About Emily - https://stealingofemily.world/about/ Dear MP, Re : FORMAL NOTICE: Failure of Statutory Safeguarding Duties and Request for Immediate Professional Standards Assessment Triage keywords: safeguarding concern; missing person; missing vulnerable person; child protection; vulnerable adult; risk of harm; public protection; duty of care; police professional standards; formal complaint; NHS records unable to locate; MP safeguarding disclosure; urgent manager review required; reference number requested safeguarding concern; missing vulnerable person; child protection; risk of harm; police professional standards; formal complaint; NHS records unable to locate; MP safeguarding disclosure; urgent manager review required; reference number requested. * Correspondence Triage Framework. * Ministerial Correspondence Guidance. * Safeguarding Escalation Workflow. * AI Classification Policy. * Case Management Configuration. * Keyword, routing, escalation or manager-review rules. * Any automated triage, NLP, AI, sentiment-analysis or workflow rules applied to this email. If this correspondence is processed by any automated correspondence-triage, case-management, workflow, AI-classification, NLP, sentiment-analysis, or routing system, I request preservation of the audit trail, classification results, routing decisions, escalation actions, safeguarding flags, manager-review actions, and all associated case notes. **On The Public Record ** References: NFRC241207046189 NFRC220205037307. NCA: CCG0000122359, SDR-026-0161 DSIT SAR 26-240, IR2025/16000 National Crime Agency Professional standards IX.8.26. National Crime Agency CCG0000122359, CAD 153 / CAD 1619 Action Fraud NFRC241207046189, SDR-026-0161. Information Commissioner Case Reference IC-461437-H0W6. PHSO C-2058682 / 00005157 / 00005290. Metropolitan Police FoIA Request - 47533. Local Government Social Care Ombudsman FOI2025/08198. IBAC (CASE-20246844). HMCTS Complaint (ref: 79534040). PALS Ref 2602-0072. Ref: NIC-803189-J4G8C. PHSO: Ref C-2195214. Clinton Library FOIA case 2025-1058-F. FOIA 2026-0609-F. FOIA 2026-0609-F / 2025-1058-F. Can you please confirm in writing the merits of why you are closing the case? Quo vadis, iustitia? I have to inform William Moore that he is breaching my published UCB by failing to provide the decision after the date he stated he would in his communications [https://martinnewbold.co.uk/Unreasonable_Behaviour_Policy...]. Paragraph 68: The Ombudsman can open a new case and reconsider an investigation decision. Paragraph 69: This can happen in exceptional circumstances, including where the original evidence was flawed, the investigation was unfair, or new information could have significantly affected the decision. Paragraph 6 also says they normally review decisions only once, except in exceptional circumstances. Providing you notice, four families are affected by the flawed decision of the PHSO. This case involves a social worker who allegedly committed fraudulent corruption of GRO records and incorrect classification of genogram data in court, which has left the Cunningham family without their daughter Lauren and my family, Newbold, without Emily and another unrelated Irish family being given both children, whilst forged documents have been expressed in NI GRO to cover her tracks when reporting in Reading to Newry advised Newry that her mother moved there with her daughter and she was not born in Newry. The Liverpool GRO has conflated two children on one birth certificate in the folios to contravene the legal registration of children; this is subject to imprisonment under the crimes on this paperwork. I have been provided no DNA evidence cross-matching to provide evidence that my daughter was ever in Northern Ireland. In addition, Social Work Northern Ireland said they could not identify my daughter in Northern Ireland. Oddly, there is a Christine named social worker and children flying out on Lolita Airlines; is this where these children ended up, Teterboro and then into the arms of Jefry Epstein and associates? So you call any of this safeguarding children? For the avoidance of doubt, this matter has already been brought to the attention of approximately 640 Members of Parliament, resulting in approximately 5120 communications, including acknowledgements, referrals, constituency notices and Parliamentary office responses. Despite this extensive correspondence, not one response has provided a substantive answer establishing the whereabouts, welfare, safeguarding status, educational status, NHS status or statutory traceability of my daughter, Emily Newbold. I will not accept further acknowledgements, automated replies, procedural deflections, constituency restrictions, generic assurances or referrals which fail to identify an accountable public authority and provide a substantive answer to the safeguarding concerns raised. You are hereby given TEN CALENDAR DAYS from receipt of this notice to provide a substantive written response, delivered by post to my stated address, identifying precisely what enquiries have been undertaken, which authorities have been contacted, what evidence has been examined, what conclusions have been reached and who is personally accountable for those conclusions. If you contend that the matter falls outside your responsibility, you must identify the relevant statutory authority, explain the basis for that position and confirm what action you have taken to bring the safeguarding concerns formally to its attention. Should this deadline expire without a substantive response, I intend to refer the documented history of unanswered safeguarding enquiries, together with the previous Parliamentary correspondence, to the appropriate oversight, regulatory and legal authorities for examination of potential failures of statutory responsibility, accountability and safeguarding procedures. Such escalation will expressly distinguish between the administrative act of replying to correspondence and the substantive discharge of safeguarding responsibilities. The fact that thousands of replies have been issued must not be presented as evidence that Emily's welfare or whereabouts have been established. I require an accountable answer, supported by identifiable enquiries and evidence, not another explanation of why nobody is prepared to provide one. All correspondence, responses and failures to address the questions raised will continue to be retained as part of the documentary evidence in my complaint to the Department for Education. For the record: I have contacted 640 MPs regarding my missing daughter, Emily, and I have received a reply from each MP. This matter is now also part of my complaint to the Department for Education. Approximately 640 MPs were contacted regarding a safeguarding concern relating to Emily Newbold and wider child traceability issues. This generated approximately 5120 email responses, acknowledgements, referrals, constituency notices and office replies. None of those responses addressed the core safeguarding question or provided confirmation of Emily Newbold's location, safeguarding status, education status, NHS status, or traceability through public systems. Previous Communication Evidence. https://www.stealingofemily.world/mailout/mail_mps.php https://www.stealingofemily.world/mailout/mail_mps_missing_emily.php https://www.stealingofemily.world/mailout/mail_mps_shadowban_video.php https://www.stealingofemily.world/mailout/mail_mps_missing_emily_please_contact%20DFE.php https://www.stealingofemily.world/mailout/mail_parliamentary_mp_safeguarding_epstein_bbc.php https://www.stealingofemily.world/mailout/mail_surrey_police_non_safe_guarding_of_mps.php https://www.stealingofemily.world/mailout/mail_640_mps_regarding_statements_inibility_to_help.php https://www.stealingofemily.world/mailout/mail_640_mps_regarding_GDPR.php https://www.stealingofemily.world/mailout/mail_640_Member_of_parliament_referral_to_parliamentary_standards.php https://www.stealingofemily.world/mailout/mail_mps_bbc_video_and_parliament_video2.php Yours Faithfully Martin Newbold 15 Valleyside Road Ore Village Hastings TN355AD 📧 www.martinnewbold.co.uk 🌐 www.thestealingofemily.co.uk 🌐stealingofemily.world Disclaimer: The attached newspaper-style images are AI-generated illustrative campaign graphics intended to represent referenced public-source issues and commentary. They are not genuine newspaper publications or reproductions of actual front pages.
FORMAL NOTICE: Failure of Statutory Safeguarding Duties and Request for Immediate Professional Standards Assessment
Triage keywords: safeguarding concern; missing person; missing vulnerable person; child protection; vulnerable adult; risk of harm; public protection; duty of care; police professional standards; formal complaint; NHS records unable to locate; MP safeguarding disclosure; urgent manager review required; reference number requested safeguarding concern; missing vulnerable person; child protection; risk of harm; police professional standards; formal complaint; NHS records unable to locate; MP safeguarding disclosure; urgent manager review required; reference number requested.
* Correspondence Triage Framework.
* Ministerial Correspondence Guidance.
* Safeguarding Escalation Workflow.
* AI Classification Policy.
* Case Management Configuration.
* Keyword, routing, escalation or manager-review rules.
* Any automated triage, NLP, AI, sentiment-analysis or workflow rules applied to this email.
If this correspondence is processed by any automated correspondence-triage, case-management, workflow, AI-classification, NLP, sentiment-analysis, or routing system, I request preservation of the audit trail, classification results, routing decisions, escalation actions, safeguarding flags, manager-review actions, and all associated case notes.
For the Attention of:
Chief Constable / Professional Standards Department
Sussex Police and Surrey Police
For the attention of every Member of Parliament (United Kingdom), I request preservation of the audit trail, classification results, routing decisions, escalation actions, safeguarding flags, manager-review actions, case notes, internal referrals, workflow history, and user-access logs associated with this correspondence.
Urgent County Enquiry Emily Newbold DOB 30/10/2006 - Urgent Intervention
About Emily - https://stealingofemily.world/about/
Dear MP,
Re : FORMAL NOTICE: Failure of Statutory Safeguarding Duties and Request for Immediate Professional Standards Assessment
Triage keywords: safeguarding concern; missing person; missing vulnerable person; child protection; vulnerable adult; risk of harm; public protection; duty of care; police professional standards; formal complaint; NHS records unable to locate; MP safeguarding disclosure; urgent manager review required; reference number requested safeguarding concern; missing vulnerable person; child protection; risk of harm; police professional standards; formal complaint; NHS records unable to locate; MP safeguarding disclosure; urgent manager review required; reference number requested.
* Correspondence Triage Framework.
* Ministerial Correspondence Guidance.
* Safeguarding Escalation Workflow.
* AI Classification Policy.
* Case Management Configuration.
* Keyword, routing, escalation or manager-review rules.
* Any automated triage, NLP, AI, sentiment-analysis or workflow rules applied to this email.
If this correspondence is processed by any automated correspondence-triage, case-management, workflow, AI-classification, NLP, sentiment-analysis, or routing system, I request preservation of the audit trail, classification results, routing decisions, escalation actions, safeguarding flags, manager-review actions, and all associated case notes.
**On The Public Record **
References:
NFRC241207046189
NFRC220205037307.
NCA: CCG0000122359,
SDR-026-0161
DSIT SAR 26-240,
IR2025/16000
National Crime Agency Professional standards IX.8.26.
National Crime Agency CCG0000122359, CAD 153 / CAD 1619
Action Fraud NFRC241207046189, SDR-026-0161.
Information Commissioner Case Reference IC-461437-H0W6.
PHSO C-2058682 / 00005157 / 00005290.
Metropolitan Police FoIA Request - 47533.
Local Government Social Care Ombudsman FOI2025/08198.
IBAC (CASE-20246844).
HMCTS Complaint (ref: 79534040).
PALS Ref 2602-0072.
Ref: NIC-803189-J4G8C.
PHSO: Ref C-2195214.
Clinton Library FOIA case 2025-1058-F.
FOIA 2026-0609-F.
FOIA 2026-0609-F / 2025-1058-F.
Can you please confirm in writing the merits of why you are closing the case?
Quo vadis, iustitia? I have to inform William Moore that he is breaching my published UCB by failing to provide the decision after the date he stated he would in his communications [https://martinnewbold.co.uk/Unreasonable_Behaviour_Policy...]. Paragraph 68: The Ombudsman can open a new case and reconsider an investigation decision. Paragraph 69: This can happen in exceptional circumstances, including where the original evidence was flawed, the investigation was unfair, or new information could have significantly affected the decision. Paragraph 6 also says they normally review decisions only once, except in exceptional circumstances. Providing you notice, four families are affected by the flawed decision of the PHSO. This case involves a social worker who allegedly committed fraudulent corruption of GRO records and incorrect classification of genogram data in court, which has left the Cunningham family without their daughter Lauren and my family, Newbold, without Emily and another unrelated Irish family being given both children, whilst forged documents have been expressed in NI GRO to cover her tracks when reporting in Reading to Newry advised Newry that her mother moved there with her daughter and she was not born in Newry. The Liverpool GRO has conflated two children on one birth certificate in the folios to contravene the legal registration of children; this is subject to imprisonment under the crimes on this paperwork. I have been provided no DNA evidence cross-matching to provide evidence that my daughter was ever in Northern Ireland. In addition, Social Work Northern Ireland said they could not identify my daughter in Northern Ireland. Oddly, there is a Christine named social worker and children flying out on Lolita Airlines; is this where these children ended up, Teterboro and then into the arms of Jefry Epstein and associates? So you call any of this safeguarding children?
For the avoidance of doubt, this matter has already been brought to the attention of approximately 640 Members of Parliament, resulting in approximately 5120 communications, including acknowledgements, referrals, constituency notices and Parliamentary office responses.
Despite this extensive correspondence, not one response has provided a substantive answer establishing the whereabouts, welfare, safeguarding status, educational status, NHS status or statutory traceability of my daughter, Emily Newbold.
I will not accept further acknowledgements, automated replies, procedural deflections, constituency restrictions, generic assurances or referrals which fail to identify an accountable public authority and provide a substantive answer to the safeguarding concerns raised.
You are hereby given TEN CALENDAR DAYS from receipt of this notice to provide a substantive written response, delivered by post to my stated address, identifying precisely what enquiries have been undertaken, which authorities have been contacted, what evidence has been examined, what conclusions have been reached and who is personally accountable for those conclusions.
If you contend that the matter falls outside your responsibility, you must identify the relevant statutory authority, explain the basis for that position and confirm what action you have taken to bring the safeguarding concerns formally to its attention.
Should this deadline expire without a substantive response, I intend to refer the documented history of unanswered safeguarding enquiries, together with the previous Parliamentary correspondence, to the appropriate oversight, regulatory and legal authorities for examination of potential failures of statutory responsibility, accountability and safeguarding procedures.
Such escalation will expressly distinguish between the administrative act of replying to correspondence and the substantive discharge of safeguarding responsibilities. The fact that thousands of replies have been issued must not be presented as evidence that Emily's welfare or whereabouts have been established.
I require an accountable answer, supported by identifiable enquiries and evidence, not another explanation of why nobody is prepared to provide one.
All correspondence, responses and failures to address the questions raised will continue to be retained as part of the documentary evidence in my complaint to the Department for Education.
For the record: I have contacted 640 MPs regarding my missing daughter, Emily, and I have received a reply from each MP. This matter is now also part of my complaint to the Department for Education. Approximately 640 MPs were contacted regarding a safeguarding concern relating to Emily Newbold and wider child traceability issues. This generated approximately 5120 email responses, acknowledgements, referrals, constituency notices and office replies. None of those responses addressed the core safeguarding question or provided confirmation of Emily Newbold's location, safeguarding status, education status, NHS status, or traceability through public systems.
Previous Communication Evidence.
https://www.stealingofemily.world/mailout/mail_mps.php
https://www.stealingofemily.world/mailout/mail_mps_missing_emily.php
https://www.stealingofemily.world/mailout/mail_mps_shadowban_video.php
https://www.stealingofemily.world/mailout/mail_mps_missing_emily_please_contact%20DFE.php
https://www.stealingofemily.world/mailout/mail_parliamentary_mp_safeguarding_epstein_bbc.php
https://www.stealingofemily.world/mailout/mail_surrey_police_non_safe_guarding_of_mps.php
https://www.stealingofemily.world/mailout/mail_640_mps_regarding_statements_inibility_to_help.php
https://www.stealingofemily.world/mailout/mail_640_mps_regarding_GDPR.php
https://www.stealingofemily.world/mailout/mail_mps_bbc_video_and_parliament_video2.php
Yours Faithfully
Martin Newbold
15 Valleyside Road
Ore Village
Hastings
TN355AD
📧 www.martinnewbold.co.uk
🌐 www.thestealingofemily.co.uk 🌐stealingofemily.world
Disclaimer: The attached newspaper-style images are AI-generated illustrative campaign graphics intended to represent referenced public-source issues and commentary. They are not genuine newspaper publications or reproductions of actual front pages.
Log file: /home/steaouun/public_html/mailout/sent_log_mps_smtp_Quo_vadis_iustitia.csv
Attachment folder: /home/steaouun/public_html/mailout/mail_mps_uploads
Evidence folder: /home/steaouun/public_html/mailout/mail_mps_evidence_Quo_vadis_iustitia
Delete sent_log_mps_smtp.csv to restart from the first MP.
Use batch size 1 for the first Gmail SMTP test.